Inconvenient Lies

Posted: August 1, 2011 in Uncategorized

Another great item from Townhall

I was, also, inspired by this item especially after my friend Katie & I were comparing notes on our local zoo. So many zoos are wrapped about the Gore-icle’s “lessons”.

Can you imagine a zoo that would require a minimal number of passengers per a car? That would have a (mandatory) donation per vehicle, per size? That would have pages upon pages that focuses on carbon footprint, and over all the sins of human existence? And imagine bringing your kids to such a zoo and paying to have them indoctrinated into the Eco-freak Religion?

The Gore-followers & eco-freaks, accepted his movie as their bible and his words as law.. Yet for anyone with even an ounce of common sense, could see Gore is/was and surely always will be a phony, he was running a scheme, either to prove he could, for political gain or profit.

From 2007: Gore’s ‘carbon offsets’ paid to firm he owns Critics say justification for energy-rich lifestyle serves as way for former  VP to profit.

Al Gore defends his extraordinary personal energy usage by telling critics he  maintains a “carbon neutral” lifestyle by buying “carbon offsets,” but the  company that receives his payments turns out to be partly owned and chaired by  the former vice president himself.

Over the years proof surfaced confirming the inaccuracy of the global-warming-hysteria data. Yet there are still lingering effects, far too intertwined into our existence to escape. It will take time to gently remove every tendril, but no doubt the damage will always be there. Will we ever have lightbulbs, real ones, again?

The Townhall article points out some of the Gore (inconvenient Truth) movie lies.. like the big focus on the polar bear. The polar bear scenario came from a scientist who worked with the US Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (that alone raises an eyebrow, doesn’t it?). That scientist was studying whales, and just assumed scenarios for the dead polar bears, without any knowledge or data to back up his theories.. yet the gore movie grabbed it and ran with it.. people bought it up, hook, line & sinker.

the polar bear mortality paper is that the dead polar bears were the result of high waves during a storm.

Attached to the polar bear heart-tugger, was the melting ice.. which while the rate is faster than normal, it is a natural (not man-made) reason.. due to varying salt levels in older ice vs newer ice.

Simon Boxall of the Catlin Artic Survey explained that it is a more complicated process than simple warming. “Because fresh meltwater is colder than seawater, that means relatively warm water is being forced upwards. And that may be part of the reason that sea ice is melting so much faster than anyone thought it would.”

So the polar bears deaths was a natural situation, the ice melt is a natural situation.. and the “data” that predicted extreme global warming in the future, will be much less.

 “The study indicates far less future global warming will occur than United Nations computer models have predicted, and supports prior studies indicating increases in atmospheric carbon dioxide trap far less heat than alarmists have claimed.”

So will Gore be financially slapped for his eco-freak propaganda film? Shouldn’t he be held responsible?

Can we at least hope all the environmental & energy crap Obama has been trying to shove through, can we hope that will be halted due to false information and well heck lies!?


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s