A friend of mine shared with me a sickening article where the 40th anniversary of “Roe-Wade” is being celebrated.
I read through the article, and I am stumbling over a response as I fight the urge to throw up. The entire scenario is disturbing, the ignorance is mind blowing.
I would like to highlight a few points from that article… and toss in my response:
“she said, 60 percent of pregnancies in Delaware are unintended.”
60% unintended.. Oops, did they bump into something? This screams lack of education & a serious problem with their behavior. Not a NEED for abortions.– as the next item here they “NEED” access to abortions.. I have never “Needed” an abortion. I would never want an abortion. But again to emphasize “NEED”?? No they NEED to be responsible for their own actions (I can not say that enough, but I will repeat it over and over!)
“Women need access to safe, healthy abortion.”
How does a pro-abortion person really justify the difference of scraping a child out of a woman.. And tossing in the trash, vs the idiot who tosses their child in the trash. How do they suddenly form some kind of empathy for that baby, is it because it is not done by ‘Planned-Abortions in the Hood’?
For me, those girls who toss their children in the trash, the pro-abortion people miss that other glaring issue.. Ummm the parents? What happened there? that the parents were not aware of their child, what was happening to their child, and not educating their child?? If they had been involved with their child, cared about them.. The situation wouldn’t have happened or the child would have talked to the parent(s) They would not be having the child on their own, and tossing it away.
“Do you prefer that these young girls put their babies in the trash, like they do in Philly?” she asked them. “Young girls are putting their babies in boxes, leaving them in the street – they are still killing them.”
Pro-abortion people supporting adoption.. Snort, snicker.. Yeah uh huh.. Sorry that one just had me laughing. That is just comical. What are those Planned “Parenthood” stats on their abortion vs adoption? humm Here this should shed some light on that:
Marchers said those babies should be offered to couples who wish to adopt them.
And we are quickly back to ignorance is bliss. As these women who bump into things and “end up” pregnant, merely by accident, of course (since surely it is not their fault, right?).. They should not be held responsible for their choices.. “that baby’s dad may not be ready” humm now there is an educational point.. How about being prepared? How about not having sex indiscriminately? How about having self respect, and taking responsibility? And how about not getting sexually involved with a criminal? So many things in this line just make me want to scream!
“But some don’t want to carry a baby,” Mitchell said. “What do you want them to do? The baby’s dad may not be ready. That’s why 20 million moms are out there with half the dads locked up.
Ahh the double negative statement… (golly I can figure this was a black woman– yeah I know that sounds racist, ok the other situation would be a Jerry Springer guest)
“You’re not supposed to kill no child,” she said. “I disagree with a person killing a baby. But a girl who is 10 or 12, raped by her grandfather, who puts her baby in a drawer – they don’t know.”
What again are those stats on grandfather rape? Did they also factor in the alien abduction rapes too? They are talking a freak scenario, not a common issue.. And those are due to a horrible crime, not stupidity or irresponsibility…like those 60% of “unintended” aka “oops I did it again” situations. Those are the bigger scenario.. Or like they highlighted in another part the woman’s priorities, that a child would just ruin her life.. Or career, or partying or whatever that excuse she opts for.. That is the bigger percentage of these abortion women.. Not because of some freak incest rape, etc.
“I saw women struggling to provide for those children,” she said. “Abortion has to be part of the consideration. … I’ve seen so many [women] whose lives are not fulfilling. It’s not life for them and their children. It’s survival at best.”
Ok this one just made me say huh.. So the woman who had too many kids, she was not ready to have, should be able to abort THOSE kids.. That sad thing is, I half way wonder if that is a direction they might be wanting to head for?
And I speak as a child who was not wanted, given the chance my parents would have done exactly that. If they had a legal method to eliminate those burdensome kids.. That just became an inconvenience.. Kinda like some people act with pets, well they aren’t cute anymore let’s get rid of them. How long before that is the mentality? Does not see far, does it?
And add to the celebration atmosphere.. That makes me wonder more if (abortions “post-term”) could be something that could come next.. Because they have become so numb to the idea of killing a baby, it is now a “right” a “choice” that if it inconveniences the woman, she should be able to.. And they have extended it to late term.. So how far till after term?
I know it makes me sick too even saying it.. But I really have to wonder, how unlikely, they already consider what they are doing to be normal & acceptable.
Read the article: http://www.delawareonline.com/article/20130123/NEWS/301230049/On-Roe-v-Wade-Delaware-still-divided